PricepectAI-Verified Comparisons

Comparisons About

⌘K

Pricepect

Independent product comparisons to help you buy smarter.

Browse

Categories
Comparisons
Spec Comparisons
Head-to-Head
Search

Info

About
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service

Top Categories

Electronics
Home & Kitchen
Sports & Outdoors
Automotive

✓ Independent & Unbiased✓ AI-Verified Data✓ Expert-Reviewed

Pricepect participates in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. © 2026 Pricepect. All rights reserved.

Vanguard VEO AM-264TR — Review & Specs | Pricepect | Pricepect

Home Camera MonopodsVanguard VEO AM-264TR

Vanguard VEO AM-264TR — image 1

Vanguard

Vanguard VEO AM-264TR

Expert Review Analysis

The Vanguard VEO AM-264TR is a compact aluminum monopod with a foldable tri‑feet base, flip‑lock system, and built‑in ball joint, offering portable stabilization for photography and videography. Weighing 0.9 kg and supporting up to 6 kg, it balances durability with convenience for travel and event shooting.

✓ Best for: Travel photographers needing a compact, stable support; event and run‑and‑gun videographers who benefit from quick setup and tri‑feet stability; solo content creators and vloggers who want a lightweight yet sturdy monopod with a ball joint; hybrid photo/video shooters who need both panning flexibility and portability.✗ Not ideal for: Users with heavy camera setups, video heads, lights or microphones that exceed 6 kg; professionals seeking the lightest possible gear who prefer carbon‑fiber monopods; situations requiring a dedicated tripod head or extreme ultralight travel where every gram counts.

Pros

✓Compact folded length of 22-23 inches makes it easy to fit in carry‑on luggage or attach to a backpack.
✓Flip‑lock mechanisms provide strong, reliable locking for maximum stability under load.

Price History

Current

$49.99

Average

$49.99

Lowest

$49.99

Highest

$49.99

Price trend (90d):0.0%

Best Seller Rank History

Now#365Best#205Worst#365 -71

Lower = better sales rank

Rating Trend

Rating3.7/ 5Reviews42

Specifications

Accessories

Included AccessoriesRubber cap, hand strap, carabiner, smartphone connector (VEO 2S variant)

Design

Height26.0 in (660 mm) mm

Width5.0 in (127 mm) mm

Length5.0 in (127 mm) mm

MaterialAluminum alloy

Leg Sections4

Features

Special FeaturesBuilt-in ball joint, tri-feet base, soft rubber handle

Ball JointYes

General

BrandVanguard

ManufacturerVANGUARD

ModelVAVEOAM264TR

ColorBlack

Weight1.9 lbs (862 g) g

Dimensions & Weight

Height26.0 inches

Width5.0 inches

Depth5.0 inches

Weight1.9 Pounds

Research Sources

vanguardworld.co.uk

camerasolutionsinc.com

bhphotovideo.com

improvephotography.com

focuscamera.com

Similar Products

Leofoto Carbon Fiber Travel Monopod, 67" Professional Lightweight Monopod with Wrist Strap for Cameras Telephoto Lens, Max Load 44.09 Lbs

Leofoto Carbon Fiber Travel Monopod, 67" Professional Lightweight Monopod with Wrist Strap for Cameras Telephoto Lens, Max Load 44.09 Lbs

LEOFOTO

Leofoto MPQ-405C 5-Sec...

IFOOTAGE Cobra RB-A400,79" Round Base Monopod,Aluminum Photography Light Stand Flat Base for DSLR Camera, Light,Payload 22LBS

IFOOTAGE Cobra RB-A400,79" Round Base Monopod,Aluminum Photography Light Stand Flat Base for DSLR Camera, Light,Payload 22LBS

IFOOTAGE

SIRUI SVM-165 Rapid Monopod for Cameras, 65” Carbon Fiber Monopod with Feet, One-Step Rapid Height Adjustment, Lightweight Travel Mono pod for DSLR Camera, Modular 3 in 1, Max Load 22lbs

SIRUI SVM-165 Rapid Monopod for Cameras, 65” Carbon Fiber Monopod with Feet, One-Step Rapid Height Adjustment, Lightweight Travel Mono pod for DSLR Camera, Modular 3 in 1, Max Load 22lbs

Sirui

SIRUI 75.8" Monopod with Feet, Professional Aluminum Travel Monopod for Cameras with Quick Release Plate, Max Load 33lbs, Compatible with Sony Canon Nikon DSLR Camera, AM-404FL+QC-55

SIRUI 75.8" Monopod with Feet, Professional Aluminum Travel Monopod for Cameras with Quick Release Plate, Max Load 33lbs, Compatible with Sony Canon Nikon DSLR Camera, AM-404FL+QC-55

Sirui

SIRUI Camera Monopod with Feet, 74" Lightweight Portable Travel Video Monopod with Pan Tilt Fluid Head for DSLR Camera Camcorder, Max Load 17.6lb/8kg, AM-MDP02

SIRUI Camera Monopod with Feet, 74" Lightweight Portable Travel Video Monopod with Pan Tilt Fluid Head for DSLR Camera Camcorder, Max Load 17.6lb/8kg, AM-MDP02

Sirui

SmallRig 166.5cm / 65.6" Carbon Fiber Monopod for Camera, Compact Camera Monopod with One-Touch Height Adjustment, Max. 5kg Playload Ball Head, Storage Size of 68cm / 26.8", Weighs 1.72kg / 3.8lb

SmallRig 166.5cm / 65.6" Carbon Fiber Monopod for Camera, Compact Camera Monopod with One-Touch Height Adjustment, Max. 5kg Playload Ball Head, Storage Size of 68cm / 26.8", Weighs 1.72kg / 3.8lb

SMALLRIG

User Reviews

Please sign in to leave a review

Sort by:

No reviews yet. Be the first to review!

3.7

(42 reviews)

$49.99

Track Price on BigBangPrice

Get notified when the price drops. Track this product on BigBangPrice, our price tracking partner.

VAVEOAM264TRBlack5 x 5 x 26 inches

Camera Monopods

✓

Integrated tri‑feet base gives a small footprint and tripod‑like stability for indoor and low‑light shooting.

✓Built‑in ball joint enables smooth panning and tilting for both photography and video applications.

✓Soft rubber handle offers a comfortable grip in various weather conditions.

✓Includes useful accessories such as rubber cap, hand strap, carabiner and smartphone connector (VEO 2S variant).

Cons

✗Weight of 0.9 kg is heavier than carbon‑fiber alternatives, which may matter for ultra‑light travel setups.
✗Maximum load capacity of 6 kg limits use with heavier camera rigs, video heads, lights or microphones.
✗No built‑in tripod head; the ball joint may not replace a dedicated head for some professional workflows.
✗The aluminum construction, while durable, is not as light as carbon‑fiber models, affecting overall portability.
✗Limited to lighter camera systems; larger rigs may exceed the rated capacity and affect performance.

From Expert Reviews

Praised by Experts

✓Tri‑feet design provides a small footprint while delivering tripod‑like stability, especially useful indoors or in low‑light environments.
✓Flip‑lock system described as “ultimate strength” delivering secure locking and maximizing the monopod’s load capacity.
✓Robust aluminum construction offers durability without adding excessive weight, praised by professionals for on‑location shooting.
✓Integrated ball joint allows smooth, professional‑grade panning and tilting for both stills and video work.
✓Compact size and quick setup are highlighted as ideal for “run‑and‑gun” event videography.

Criticized by Experts

✗At just under 2 lb, it is heavier than comparable carbon‑fiber monopods, which some pros view as a drawback for ultra‑light travel.
✗The 6 kg (13 lb) load capacity can be reached quickly when adding video heads, lights or microphones, limiting heavier setups.
✗Some reviewers note the weight is comparable to “two bags of flour,” indicating it is not the lightest option on the market.
✗Lack of a dedicated tripod head may require additional accessories for certain professional shooting scenarios.

From User Reviews

Users Love

✓Extremely portable and fits easily in travel bags, making it convenient for on‑the‑go photographers.
✓Tri‑feet provide excellent stability, giving a hand‑held‑feel video experience that users appreciate.
✓Lightweight yet durable aluminum build is praised for not feeling flimsy despite its low weight.
✓Ball joint allows smooth, professional‑grade panning and tilting, noted as a valuable feature by users.
✓Reliable flip locks hold firmly, giving confidence during extended shooting sessions.
✓Versatile for both photo and video, and can double as a walking stick, according to user comments.

Users Complain About

✗Heavier than carbon‑fiber alternatives, which some users find problematic for ultra‑light travel.
✗Load capacity of 6 kg may be insufficient for setups with video heads, lights or additional accessories.
✗Users with larger rigs report the monopod cannot support their equipment, limiting its applicability.
✗The aluminum build, while sturdy, does not match the feather‑weight feel of carbon‑fiber models.
✗Some users find the lack of a built‑in tripod head reduces flexibility for certain shooting styles.

Expert Opinion

Professional reviewers praise the VEO AM‑264TR for its tri‑feet base that delivers tripod‑like stability in a compact form, the robust flip‑lock system and the smooth ball‑joint for panning. They note the build quality is solid for aluminum and appreciate its suitability for run‑and‑gun event shooting. However, they point out that the monopod is heavier than carbon‑fiber options and its 6 kg load limit can be reached quickly when adding video accessories.

What Users Say

Everyday users highlight the monopod’s portability, easy fit in travel bags, and the stability provided by the tri‑feet, calling it a reliable tool for both photo and video. They also appreciate the comfortable rubber handle and reliable flip locks. Common complaints focus on its weight compared to carbon‑fiber models and the limited load capacity that restricts heavier camera rigs.

Common Complaints

Weight heavier than carbon‑fiber alternatives; load capacity of 6 kg limiting for larger rigs; lack of built‑in tripod head; aluminum feel not as feather‑light as carbon fiber; occasional concerns about stability with heavier accessories.

How It Compares

vs. VEO 2S AM-264TR

Advantages

✓Includes a smartphone connector for attaching a phone, adding versatility
✓Same weight and load capacity as standard model, maintaining stability

Disadvantages

✗Does not improve weight or load capacity over the standard version
✗Still lacks a dedicated tripod head

Choose the VEO 2S if you need smartphone integration; otherwise the standard AM‑264TR offers the same performance.

vs. Carbon Fiber Vanguard

Advantages

✓Significantly lighter at approximately 0.75 lb, ideal for ultralight travel
✓Provides comparable extended height and load capacity

Disadvantages

✗Lacks the tri‑feet base, reducing stability compared to the AM‑264TR
✗Potentially higher cost due to carbon‑fiber construction

Select the carbon‑fiber version for minimal weight when stability is less critical; choose the AM‑264TR for added stability.

vs. AM-264 (no tri-feet)

Advantages

✓More compact design without the tri‑feet, making it easier to pack
✓Slightly lighter than the tri‑feet version

Disadvantages

✗Missing the tri‑feet base reduces stability, especially on uneven surfaces
✗Weight is still higher than carbon‑fiber alternatives

Opt for the no‑tri‑feet AM‑264 if maximum compactness is priority; otherwise the AM‑264TR offers better stability.