Asus ROG Strix XG27ACDNG
Score: 87/100
Samsung Odyssey G9
Score: 85/100Rankings
The ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACDNG is a 26.5-inch QD-OLED monitor offering an extreme 360 Hz refresh rate, 0.03 ms response and 99% DCI-P3 color coverage with HDR support. Its premium performance comes with high power draw, potential OLED burn-in risk, and a hefty build without speakers. Targeted at esports pros and HDR enthusiasts demanding top-tier visual fidelity.
The Samsung Odyssey G9 is a massive 49-inch ultrawide VA monitor offering DQHD resolution, 240 Hz refresh, and HDR1000 brightness for immersive gaming and productivity. Its size, weight, and limited ergonomic adjustments make it less suitable for cramped desks. Best for enthusiasts seeking a high-refresh ultrawide experience.
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
26.5 inches | 49 inchesbest | |
360 Hzbest | 240 Hz | |
| ↓ lower better | 0.03 msbest | 1 ms |
250 nits | 450 nitsbest | |
99 %best | 92 % | |
1,500,000best | 2,500 | |
| ↓ lower better | 7.44 kgbest | 15.6 kg |
1best | 1best |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
Display(9) | ||
Panel Type | QD-OLED | VA |
Screen Size (inches) | 26.5 inches | 49 inches |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 5120x1440 |
Refresh Rate (Hz) | 360 Hz | 240 Hz |
Response Time (ms) | 0.03 ms | 1 ms |
Brightness (nits) | 250 nits | 450 nits |
Color Gamut Coverage (%) | 99 % | 92 % |
Static Contrast Ratio | 1500000 | 2500 |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 32:9 |
General(1) | ||
Warranty (years) | 3 years | 1 years |
Build & Design(3) | ||
Weight (with stand) (kg) | 7.44 kg | 15.60 kg |
Width (with stand) (mm) | 610.3 mm | 1148 mm |
Height (with stand) (mm) | 509.4 mm | 568 mm |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers commend the monitor's premium QD-OLED panel, ultra-high 360 Hz refresh rate, and robust anti-flicker and burn-in technologies, positioning it as a top-tier choice for esports and HDR work, though they note the scarcity of in-depth independent testing and lingering OLED burn-in worries.
No specific user reviews or testimonials were found in the research, indicating limited publicly shared consumer feedback.
