Rankings
The Garmin vívoactive 5 offers an AMOLED touchscreen, extensive sport and health tracking features, and an impressive 11-day battery life, making it a versatile fitness companion. It lacks premium health sensors such as ECG and has limited media functionality. Best for active users who value long battery life and a rich suite of sport apps without needing advanced medical-grade sensors.
The Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro is a premium fitness tracker featuring a 1.74-inch AMOLED screen, multi-constellation GNSS and up to 21 days of battery life, targeting outdoor enthusiasts who need accurate phone-free GPS. Its larger size, lack of NFC and occasional auto-brightness lag may deter users seeking a slimmer, fully featured smartwatch. Best for athletes who prioritize a bright display and robust GPS over ultra-thin design.
The Amazfit Active 2 Sport offers a large 1.75-inch AMOLED display, built-in GPS and up to 14 days of battery life, targeting budget-conscious fitness fans. It lacks NFC and can suffer occasional Bluetooth connectivity issues. Perfect for users who prioritize long endurance and a wide range of sport modes.
The Amazfit Active 2 Premium is a stylish smartwatch featuring a 1.75-inch AMOLED display and up to 14 days of battery life. Its lightweight stainless-steel construction and built-in GPS make it ideal for everyday wear, though it lacks NFC and advanced sport-mode depth. Best suited for fashion-focused fitness users.
The Amazfit Bip 5 Core offers an exceptionally long battery life and a sizable 1.91-inch screen at a budget price, making it a solid everyday tracker. Its trade-offs include less accurate heart-rate readings and a simplistic UI. Ideal for casual users who prioritize endurance and affordability over premium sensor precision.
The COROS Pace 3 provides solid dual-frequency GPS accuracy, long battery life and lightweight strap options in a 1.2" transflective LCD watch. Its heavier 150 g case, absence of built-in audio and limited mapping features are notable drawbacks. Suited for runners and triathletes who prioritize battery and GPS over extensive smartwatch features.
| Attribute | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
264 hours | 336 hours | 336 hours | 504 hoursbest | 38 hours | 264 hours | |
— | 260 mAh | — | 350 mAhbest | — | — | |
| ↓ lower better | 36 g | 31.75 g | 29.5 gbest | 40 g | 150 g | 132 g |
1.2 inches | 1.75 inches | 1.75 inches | 1.74 inches | 1.2 inches | 1.91 inchesbest | |
| ↓ lower better | — | 120 minutes | — | 75 minutesbest | — | — |
| ↓ lower better | 11.1 mmbest | — | — | — | 11.7 mm | — |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery & Power(3) | ||||||
Battery Life (hours) | 264 hours | 336 hours | 336 hours | 504 hours | 38 hours | 264 hours |
Battery Capacity (mAh) | — | 260 mAh | — | 350 mAh | — | — |
Charging Time (minutes) | — | 120 minutes | — | 75 minutes | — | — |
Connectivity(1) | ||||||
Bluetooth Version | — | 5.2 | — | 5.4 | — | 5.0 |
Display(3) | ||||||
Display Size (inches) | 1.20 inches | 1.75 inches | 1.75 inches | 1.74 inches | 1.2 inches | 1.91 inches |
Display Resolution | 390x390 | 390x450 | 390x450 | 336x480 | 260x260 | — |
Display Type | AMOLED | AMOLED | — | AMOLED | Transflective LCD | — |
Build & Design(5) | ||||||
Weight (g) | 36 g | 31.75 g | 29.5 g | 40 g | 150 g | 132 g |
Thickness (mm) | 11.1 mm | — | — | — | 11.7 mm | — |
Case Material | — | Stainless steel | Aluminum alloy + plastic | Aluminum alloy | High-strength polymer | — |
Strap Material | — | Silicone/Leather | Silicone | TPU | Silicone | — |
Water Resistance (IP Rating) | 5 ATM | 5 ATM | 5 ATM | 5ATM | 5 ATM | — |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers position the Amazfit Active as a premium-looking smartwatch that balances striking aesthetics with robust health monitoring. They commend its bright 2,000-nit AMOLED screen, lightweight aluminum construction, and deep integration with the Zepp app, while noting that its feature set is more fashion-oriented than sport-focused compared to the Active 2.
Consumers repeatedly praise the watch's feather-light feel, attractive color choices, and impressive battery endurance. The consensus is that the Active delivers a stylish daily companion that reliably tracks basic health metrics without frequent charging interruptions.
“Up to 14 days of battery life in typical use, far exceeding most competitors.”
“Lacks NFC and advanced sensors such as an altimeter.”
“Large 1.74-inch AMOLED screen with 336 × 480, 1200 nits is "really useful"”
Choose the Active for a bigger screen and longer battery; choose the Active 2 if you need more workout tracking and premium glass.
Choose Active for ultra-lightweight, long-lasting use; choose Active 2 for a brighter screen and more advanced sensors.
Professional reviewers commend the Amazfit Active for its exceptional value at around $99, offering a large AMOLED screen, extensive sport modes, AI health coaching, and a standout 14-day battery. However, they point out the lack of premium sensors like an altimeter, a less refined rectangular look, and unspecified brightness that may lag behind the Active 2's 2,000-nit display.
Everyday users overwhelmingly appreciate the long battery life, feather-light weight, vivid display, and reliable fitness tracking, especially GPS and heart-rate monitoring. Recurring complaints focus on occasional Bluetooth drops, occasional GPS inaccuracies in dense areas, strap comfort for larger wrists, and the absence of NFC and broader third-party app support.
Professional reviewers consider the Smart Band 9 Pro a significant step forward, emphasizing its expansive high-brightness display, robust GNSS capabilities, and comprehensive sport and health features. While the device is praised for comfort and visual clarity, the only notable drawback mentioned is the occasional lag in automatic brightness adaptation under sudden lighting changes.
Everyday users love the vivid screen, long battery life, and reliable GPS for workouts, finding the health sensors valuable. Common frustrations revolve around the band's bulk on smaller wrists, delayed auto-brightness in sunlight, and the need to replace the strap for extended comfort during long wear.
Professional reviewers commend the COROS Pace Pro for its industry-leading battery life, robust offline mapping and advanced health sensors, but point out its bulkier profile, lack of built-in audio and limited music controls compared to higher-priced competitors.
Consumers overwhelmingly appreciate the long battery endurance, lightweight comfort and accurate GPS, while noting occasional heart-rate sensor glitches and the missing charging cable.
Professional reviewers commend the Bip series for its impressive battery longevity, comfortable design and functional GPS, noting that it delivers a solid mix of features at a low price. However, they criticize the heart-rate sensor's inaccuracy, the simplistic UI and the relatively slow GPS lock, which keep it from competing with higher-end models.
Everyday users consistently praise the watch's long battery life, comfort and large readable screen, often calling it a great value for casual fitness and swimming. Recurring complaints focus on heart-rate inaccuracies, occasional step-count errors, strap wear and the occasional delay in GPS acquisition.
