
Chicago Pneumatic CP879C
Score: 72/100
Ftvogue Air Angle Drill
Score: 60/100Rankings

The Chicago Pneumatic CP879C is a specialized angle air drill designed for precision work in confined automotive and industrial spaces. Its main trade-off is limited torque output, making it unsuitable for heavy-duty large-hole drilling. It is best suited for professionals in body shops and maintenance who need maneuverability over raw power.

The Ftvogue 90 Degree Air Angle Reversible Drill is a compact zinc alloy tool designed for drilling in tight spaces, featuring a 90-degree head and 1800 RPM speed. Its main drawback is the potentially high air consumption and lack of detailed performance data, which may strain standard compressors. It is best suited for DIY enthusiasts and light industrial users needing a pneumatic right-angle tool for confined spaces.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
2,000 RPMbest | 1,800 RPM | |
4.4 N·mbest | — | |
| ↓ lower better | 21.2 CFM | 17.66 CFMbest |
90 PSI | 116.03 PSIbest | |
0.375 inchesbest | 0.375 inchesbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 3.21 lbs | 2.5 lbsbest |
| ↓ lower better | 8.58 inchesbest | — |
| ↓ lower better | 80.6 dBbest | — |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Design & Ergonomics(2) | ||
Tool Weight (lbs) | 3.21 lbs | 2.5 lbs |
Handle Style | Angle | Right-Angle |
Compatibility & Air Requirements(2) | ||
Air Consumption (CFM) | 21.2 CFM | 17.66 CFM |
Operating Pressure (PSI) | 90 PSI | 116.03 PSI |
Features & Controls(1) | ||
Speed Control Type | Trigger | Lever |
Build & Durability(1) | ||
Housing Material | Aluminum/Composite | Zinc Alloy |
Performance & Power(2) | ||
Free Speed (RPM) (RPM) | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Gear Configuration | Standard | Hardened Reduction |

Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

Manufacturer and retailer descriptions emphasize reliability, ergonomics, and suitability for confined-area drilling in MRO applications.
No consumer reviews, ratings, or forum discussions were found in the research data.

