Garmin Forerunner 55
Score: 75/100
Polar Ignite 3
Score: 74/100Rankings
The Garmin Forerunner 55 is an entry-level GPS running watch with a lightweight design, long battery life and a sunlight-visible MIP display, making it ideal for beginners. Its limitations include a lack of advanced health sensors and modest customization options. Suited for casual runners who want reliable GPS and endurance without premium features.
The Polar Ignite 3 Titanium is a lightweight fitness smartwatch with a titanium case, vivid AMOLED display and dual-frequency GPS, offering up to 30 hours of GPS training. It lacks advanced health sensors like SpO₂ and a larger screen, and its battery may fall short for ultra-long sessions. Best for runners and wellness-focused users who prioritize comfort and accurate GPS.
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
336 hoursbest | 30 hours | |
— | 215 mAhbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 37 g | 36 gbest |
1.04 inches | 1.28 inchesbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 11.6 mm | 9.5 mmbest |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
Battery & Power(1) | ||
Battery Life (hours) | 336 hours | 30 hours |
Display(3) | ||
Display Size (inches) | 1.04 inches | 1.28 inches |
Display Resolution | 208x208 | 416 x 416 |
Display Type | MIP | AMOLED |
Build & Design(3) | ||
Weight (g) | 37 g | 36 g |
Thickness (mm) | 11.6 mm | 9.5 mm |
Water Resistance (IP Rating) | 5 ATM | 30m |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers consider the Forerunner 55 a well-rounded, budget-friendly entry-level running watch. They commend its long battery life, clear display, and reliable wrist-based heart-rate monitoring, while noting the lack of advanced sensors and limited data customization as trade-offs for its price point.
Professional reviewers commend the Ignite 3 Titanium for its sleek titanium chassis, lightweight comfort, vivid AMOLED screen, impressive battery life, and highly accurate dual-frequency GPS. However, they criticize its modest display size, the omission of health sensors like ECG and SpO₂, and a relatively sparse ecosystem of widgets and watch faces, positioning it as a fitness-focused alternative rather than a full-featured smartwatch.
Everyday users love how light and comfortable the watch feels, especially the dual-size straps that suit smaller wrists. They also value the clear AMOLED display and multi-day battery life. Recurring frustrations revolve around the small screen, missing SpO₂/ECG/NFC features, and a desire for more premium band options and widget variety.
“crazy light at 35-36 g”
