
hOmeLabs Beverage Refrigerator
Score: 73/100
Tylza Drawer Fridge 24-inch
Score: 73/100Rankings

The hOmeLabs beverage refrigerator offers a compact 3.2 cu ft (≈42 L) capacity with LED lighting, adjustable shelves, and auto-defrost. It trades off security features and certifications for a lower price and smaller footprint. Ideal for home bars, dorms, or small office break rooms.

The Tylza 24-inch under-counter fridge features dual-zone temperature control and a sleek stainless-steel glass door, offering quiet operation and flexible installation. Its limited can capacity and absence of energy-efficiency ratings are notable drawbacks. Best for small households or offices needing separate beverage and wine cooling.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
42.6 Lbest | — | |
846.42 mm | 870 mmbest | |
480.06 mm | 595.1 mmbest | |
439.42 mm | 574.8 mmbest | |
1.1 °Cbest | — | |
| ↓ lower better | — | 38 dBbest |
| ↓ lower better | 30.97 kgbest | 44.9 kg |
| ↓ lower better | 75 Wbest | — |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Dimensions(3) | ||
Height (mm) | 846.42 mm | 870.0 mm |
Width (mm) | 480.06 mm | 595.1 mm |
Depth (mm) | 439.42 mm | 574.8 mm |
Build & Design(2) | ||
Door Type | reinforced insulated clear glass | Stainless steel |
Weight (kg) | 30.97 kg | 44.9 kg |
Performance(1) | ||
Temperature Range (°C) | 1.1 °C | 2.8-18.3 °C |

Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

Professional reviewers describe the hOmeLabs HME030065N as a solid mid-range drinks fridge that balances capacity, digital controls, and quiet operation. They commend its reversible glass door, adjustable shelving, automatic defrost and memory functions, while noting the lack of a lock, non-door-activated lighting, and absence of certifications as minor drawbacks.

Professional sources and product pages stress the TYBC145's quiet operation, precise dual-zone temperature control, and upscale design, but they also point out the lack of independent validation and missing energy-efficiency data, leaving some performance claims unverified.
