HP 24mh
Score: 80/100
TCL 32S350R
Score: 73/100Rankings
The HP 24mh is a 23.8-inch budget-friendly IPS monitor offering Full HD resolution, excellent color accuracy, ergonomic adjustments and a trio of video inputs, making it a solid choice for home office and casual use.
The TCL 32-inch S3 is an affordable full-HD smart TV with basic HDR and a decent set of connectivity options, ideal for bedrooms or secondary rooms. While it offers solid picture quality for its price, it lacks advanced gaming features and premium audio.
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
23.8 inches | 32 inchesbest | |
2,073,600 pixelsbest | 2,073,600 pixelsbest | |
75 Hzbest | 60 Hz | |
250 nitsbest | — | |
1,000best | — | |
99.5 %best | — | |
| ↓ lower better | 5 msbest | — |
| ↓ lower better | 22 Wbest | 50 W |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
Display(4) | ||
Screen Size (inches) | 23.8 inches | 32 inches |
Resolution (total pixels) (pixels) | 2073600 pixels | 1920x1080 pixels |
Refresh Rate (Hz) | 75 Hz | 60 Hz |
Panel Type | IPS | LED |
Power & Energy(1) | ||
Typical Power Consumption (W) | 22 W | 50 W |
Connectivity(2) | ||
HDMI Ports (count) | 1 count | 3 count |
USB Ports (count) | 0 count | 1 count |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers, including PCMag's Editors' Choice rating of 4.5/5, praise the HP 24mh for its impressive color accuracy, high contrast, ergonomic stand and inclusion of DisplayPort, calling it a benchmark-setting budget monitor. They note the lower-than-rated brightness and absence of adaptive sync as the main drawbacks.
Everyday users overwhelmingly view the HP 24mh as a great value, highlighting its sharp visuals, adjustable stand and easy setup. Common praise centers on color vibrancy and thin bezels, while recurring complaints focus on dimness in bright environments, inconsistent out-of-the-box color calibration, weak built-in speakers, and occasional stand wobble.
Editors praise the straightforward Roku interface and HDR support as strong value for a sub-$200 TV, but note the missing Ethernet on the Google TV version and lack of HDMI 2.1/VRR limit its appeal to serious gamers.
Users love the price-to-performance ratio, easy setup, and sharp picture, though they criticize the thin speakers, ads on Google TV, and occasional streaming lag.
“The built-in speakers are tinny and weak.”
“The adjustable stand is a major plus for comfort.”
“Great value for a home office monitor.”
