
Kingston A400 240GB
Score: 52/100
Crucial BX500 2TB
Score: 67/100Rankings

The Crucial BX500 2TB is an affordable SATA SSD that offers decent sequential performance and low power draw, making it suitable for budget upgrades. Its lack of DRAM, hardware encryption, and modest endurance keep it from higher-end tiers.

The Kingston A400 240 GB SATA SSD is an entry-level drive that offers a dramatic speed boost over HDDs at a low price, but its limited write speed, lack of DRAM, and modest endurance restrict it to light workloads.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
240 GB | 2,000 GBbest | |
500 MB/s | 540 MB/sbest | |
350 MB/s | 500 MB/sbest | |
80 TBW | 720 TBWbest | |
3 yearsbest | 3 yearsbest | |
0 GBbest | — | |
| ↓ lower better | 0.279 W | 0.1 Wbest |
| ↓ lower better | 0.195 Wbest | — |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Performance(2) | ||
Sequential Read Speed (MB/s) | 500 MB/s | 540 MB/s |
Sequential Write Speed (MB/s) | 350 MB/s | 500 MB/s |
Storage(3) | ||
Capacity (GB) | 240 GB | 2000 GB |
Form Factor | 2.5 inch | 2.5-inch |
NAND Type | 3D TLC | 3D NAND TLC |
Power & Thermal(1) | ||
Active Power Consumption (W) | 0.279 W | 0.1 W |
Reliability(2) | ||
Endurance (TBW) (TBW) | 80 TBW | 720 TBW |
MTBF (hours) | 1000000 hours | 1500000 hours |
Physical(1) | ||
Weight (g) | 41 g | 35.07 g |


Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

Professional reviewers position the A400 as a budget-friendly entry-level SSD that breathes new life into older systems, praising its plug-and-play ease, reliability, and shock resistance while noting the lack of DRAM cache and limited endurance make it unsuitable for demanding workloads.
Everyday users overwhelmingly appreciate the dramatic boot-time reduction and overall responsiveness, rating it around 4.7/5 stars; praise focuses on easy installation and value, while complaints center on occasional drive failures, slower sustained write speeds, and delayed RMA support.

Professional reviewers view the BX500 as a solid budget option that delivers decent sequential speeds but falls short of the MX500 due to the lack of DRAM, lower endurance, and missing security features.
Everyday users overwhelmingly praise the BX500 for its fast boot times, noticeable system responsiveness, and ample 2 TB storage, though complaints focus on higher operating temperatures, occasional DOA units, and limited suitability for write-intensive tasks.
“My PC boots too fast now - I can't even finish making coffee before it's ready!”

“95% faster boot after replacing an HDD.”

“Like getting a new computer.”

