
Kingston A400 960GB
Score: 62/100
Crucial BX500 240GB
Score: 70/100Rankings

The Crucial BX500 240 GB is a budget-focused SATA SSD that delivers a noticeable speed boost over traditional hard drives while keeping power consumption low, but its DRAM-less design and lack of encryption limit its suitability for heavy workloads.

The Kingston A400 960 GB SSD provides entry-level SATA performance with 500 MB/s reads and 450 MB/s writes, making it a solid, budget-friendly upgrade for users moving from HDDs.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
960 GBbest | 240 GB | |
500 MB/s | 540 MB/sbest | |
450 MB/s | 500 MB/sbest | |
300 TBWbest | 80 TBW | |
3 yearsbest | 3 yearsbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 0.279 W | 0.06 Wbest |
| ↓ lower better | 0.195 Wbest | — |
1,000,000 hours | 1,500,000 hoursbest |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Performance(2) | ||
Sequential Read Speed (MB/s) | 500 MB/s | 540 MB/s |
Sequential Write Speed (MB/s) | 450 MB/s | 500 MB/s |
Storage(5) | ||
Capacity (GB) | 960 GB | 240 GB |
Form Factor | 2.5-inch | 2.5" |
NAND Type | 3D TLC | TLC |
Endurance (TBW) (TBW) | 300 TBW | 80 TBW |
MTBF (hours) | 1000000 hours | 1500000 hours |
Power & Energy(1) | ||
Active Power Consumption (W) | 0.279 W | 0.06 W |
Design & Build(2) | ||
Weight (g) | 40.82 g | 60 g |
Thickness (mm) | 7.11 mm | 7 mm |


Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

Professional reviewers view the Kingston A400 as a solid, budget-friendly upgrade that revives older systems with noticeable speed gains. They commend its reliability, shock resistance, and value, while noting the trade-off of a missing DRAM cache and its positioning away from high-performance or enterprise use cases.
Everyday users overwhelmingly praise the SSD for its fast boot and load times, excellent price-to-performance ratio, and the confidence that comes with the Kingston brand. The most common complaints revolve around occasional customer service delays and the need to buy extra accessories such as SATA cables.

Professional reviewers view the BX500 as a solid, low-cost SATA SSD that meets basic performance expectations but falls short of Crucial's own MX500 in endurance, security, and warranty. The DRAM-less design keeps price down but limits sustained performance.
Everyday users praise the immediate speed uplift, quiet operation, and low power draw, especially when upgrading legacy machines, while complaints focus on setup quirks and desire for a longer warranty or accessories.
“Fast boot, fast games”

“Great value for the price”

“Customer Support Delays: 3-week RMA wait time with minimal communication”


