Lexmark N8352
Score: 71/100Loyalty-secu Mini
Score: 81/100Rankings
The LOYALTY-SECU Mini Wireless Print Server adds Wi-Fi, Ethernet, Bluetooth and cloud capabilities to any USB printer, with broad OS and printer compatibility. Its higher price and need for continuous power are the main trade-offs. Ideal for home offices or small businesses needing versatile multi-user printing.
The Lexmark N8352 Wireless Print Server adds 802.11b/g/n Wi-Fi and NFC to compatible Lexmark printers, delivering secure wireless printing and tap-to-print features. Its lack of warranty and restriction to certain models limit broader appeal. Best for Lexmark users needing secure, NFC-enabled wireless printing.
| Attribute | | Loyalty-secu Mini |
|---|---|---|
72 Mbps | 150 Mbpsbest | |
— | 1best | |
— | 100 Mbpsbest | |
1best | 1best | |
— | 5 Vbest | |
| ↓ lower better | — | 10 Wbest |
0 years | 1 yearsbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 0.227 kg | 0.025 kgbest |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | Loyalty-secu Mini |
|---|---|---|
Connectivity(2) | ||
Frequency Band | 2.40 GHz | 2.4GHz & 5GHz |
Wireless Speed (Mbps) | 72 Mbps | 150 Mbps |
General(2) | ||
Printer Compatibility | Lexmark C2425, C2535, CS421, CS521, CS622, CX410, CX421, CX510, CX522, CX622, CX625, MS510 | Over 99.5% of printer models |
Warranty (years) | 0 years | 1 years |
Design & Build(2) | ||
Weight (kg) | 0.2268 kg | 0.025 kg |
Dimensions (L×W×H) (mm) | 9.0×1.75×6.25 inches mm | 135×50×135 mm mm |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers consider the LOYALTY-SECU Mini Wireless Print Server a high-quality, reliable solution that stands out for its multi-connection capabilities and ability to let multiple users share a single printer.
Consumers generally praise the device for removing cable clutter, enabling flexible printer placement, and offering remote/cloud printing. The most common criticism from users revolves around its relatively steep price and the scarcity of extensive user-generated feedback.
