
Midea WHS-65LB1
Score: 80/100
RCA Compact Refrigerator
Score: 79/100Rankings

The Midea WHS-65LB1 is a 1.6 cu ft compact fridge with a reversible door, separate freezer and ENERGY STAR efficiency. Its trade-offs include manual defrost and limited interior shelving. Best suited for dorms, small apartments or office break rooms needing a tiny freezer.

The RCA RFR835 is a compact 3.2 cu ft two-door fridge with ENERGY STAR efficiency, a reversible door, and a separate freezer compartment. Its modest capacity and lack of advanced features like LED lighting limit its appeal for larger households. Suitable for students or office spaces needing an energy-saving mini-fridge.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
1.6 cu ft | 3.2 cu ftbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 42 dB | 25 dBbest |
1 yearsbest | 1 yearsbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 49.28 cmbest | 86.36 cm |
| ↓ lower better | 47.24 cmbest | 50.8 cm |
| ↓ lower better | 44.96 cmbest | 55.88 cm |
6best | — | |
| ↓ lower better | 14.772 kgbest | 23.52 kg |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Noise & Operation(1) | ||
Noise Level (dB) | 42 dB | 25 dB |
Energy & Power(1) | ||
Compressor Type | R600A | Compressor |
Capacity & Dimensions(5) | ||
Capacity (cu ft) | 1.6 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
Height (cm) | 49.28 cm | 86.36 cm |
Width (cm) | 47.24 cm | 50.80 cm |
Depth (cm) | 44.96 cm | 55.88 cm |
Weight (kg) | 14.772 kg | 23.52 kg |

Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

TechReviewer and Vocal Media both acknowledge the Midea WHS-65LB1 as a well-designed ultra-compact fridge that delivers solid energy efficiency and quiet operation. They appreciate the reversible door and the inclusion of a small freezer, which are uncommon in this size segment. However, they note the modest storage volume and the need for manual defrost as trade-offs for its compact footprint.

Professional reviewers emphasize the unit’s ENERGY STAR rating and low annual energy consumption of 323 kWh as standout efficiency points. They also commend the automatic defrost system and the flexibility of a reversible door combined with a separate freezer compartment, noting these features set it apart from many basic mini‑fridges. However, reviewers point out the limited capacity and absence of ice‑making or smart controls as trade‑offs.

There is little publicly available user feedback in the sources, so consumer sentiment cannot be fully assessed. The limited data suggests that users who prioritize space-saving and energy efficiency appreciate the model, while the lack of ice-maker and small capacity are common concerns.