Paragon In-Wall Safe Cream
Score: 65/100
Viking Security VS-52BLX
Score: 88/100Rankings
The Viking Security Safe VS-52BLX is a heavy-duty, hidden in-wall biometric safe designed for discreet concealment and high security. Its laser-cut welded steel body and motorized deadbolts offer robust protection against pry attacks. It is best suited for homeowners seeking multi-user access via fingerprints and quick entry in low-light conditions.
The Paragon In-Wall Safe offers a discreet storage solution with an LED keypad and manual override keys. It lacks advanced security features like biometrics or fireproofing, making it best for low-risk document storage. The standard steel construction provides basic protection against casual theft.
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
350 cubic_inches | 989.4 cubic_inchesbest | |
3best | 2 | |
1 yearsbest | 1 yearsbest | |
1 inchesbest | 0.2 inches | |
0 | 32best |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
Dimensions & Capacity(3) | ||
Internal Volume (cubic_inches) | 350 cubic_inches | 989.4 cubic_inches |
External Dimensions | 16.25 x 22.0 x 4.0 | 19.0 x 4.0 x 14.0 inches |
Internal Dimensions | 14.5 x 20.5 x 3.0 | 9.7 x 13.6 x 7.5 inches |
Security & Locking(2) | ||
Locking Mechanism | Electronic Keypad | Motorized Deadbolt |
Deadbolt Count | 3 | 2 |
Security & Protection(1) | ||
Pry Resistance | Standard | High |
Installation & Support(1) | ||
Mounting Type | In-Wall | Recessed Wall Mount |
Power & Access(2) | ||
Access Method | Keypad | Biometric, Keypad, Key |
Fingerprint Capacity | 0 | 32 |
Materials & Build(1) | ||
Door Thickness (inches) | 1.0 inches | 0.2 inches |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers praise the VS-52BLX for its generous space, hardy construction, and wealth of security options. They highlight the advanced optical sensor, keypad, LCD display, and pry-resistant features as key strengths.
Search results provide no direct consumer reviews, ratings beyond a vague 4.6 mention without details, or YouTube comments. Common praise cannot be identified from recurring feedback, and no specific complaints are documented by everyday users in the available data.
