
Planar PCT2485
Score: 65/100
Elo E829550 15-inch
Score: 65/100Rankings

The Planar Helium PCT2485 is a 24-inch Full HD interactive touchscreen with 10-point touch, integrated webcam, and solid connectivity, suited for kiosks and collaborative workspaces.

The Elo E829550 is a compact 15-inch commercial-grade touchscreen with a zero-bezel SAW surface, offering low power draw and robust mounting options for high-traffic or hygiene-critical environments. Its limited resolution and single-touch capability make it less suitable for graphics-intensive or multi-user applications.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
23.6 inchesbest | 15 inches | |
220 nits | 300 nitsbest | |
1,000best | 800 | |
60 Hz | 75 Hzbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 14 msbest | 23 ms |
10best | 1 | |
1best | 1best | |
3best | 1 |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Touch(2) | ||
Touch Technology | Projected Capacitive | SAW |
Touch Points | 10 | 1 |
Display(8) | ||
Screen Size (inches) | 23.6 inches | 15 inches |
Native Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1024x768 |
Brightness (nits) | 220 nits | 300 nits |
Contrast Ratio | 1000 | 800 |
Refresh Rate (Hz) | 60 Hz | 75 Hz |
Response Time (ms) | 14 ms | 23 ms |
Panel Type | LED LCD | Active matrix TFT LCD |
Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 4:3 |
Connectivity(1) | ||
USB Ports | 3 | 1 |
Power & Energy(2) | ||
Power Consumption (W) | 35 W | 10.5 W |
Standby Power (W) | 1 W | 1.4 W |
Build & Design(1) | ||
Weight (kg) | 6.214 kg | 4.3 kg |


Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

Professional reviewers praise the Helium PCT2485 for its responsive 10-point touch, solid picture quality, and enterprise-grade reliability, noting its HID-compliant design works seamlessly with Windows and Linux.
Everyday users commend the sleek look and easy setup, while noting the modest brightness and low speaker volume as drawbacks.

Pros highlight the rugged zero-bezel design, global voltage support and low power usage, while cons focus on the low resolution and lack of multi-touch.
Users value the durability and easy installation, but note the limited resolution and single-touch functionality as drawbacks.
“In my opinion, the Planar has the better touch feel and better picture”

“Absolutely stunning”

“Works great for video conferencing, general computing, and watching movies”


