RCA Compact Refrigerator
Score: 79/100
Cowsar 3.2 Cu.Ft Fridge with Freezer
Score: 79/100Rankings
The RCA RFR835 is a compact 3.2 cu ft two-door fridge with ENERGY STAR efficiency, a reversible door, and a separate freezer compartment. Its modest capacity and lack of advanced features like LED lighting limit its appeal for larger households. Suitable for students or office spaces needing an energy-saving mini-fridge.
The COWSAR BCD-87 is a 3.2 cu ft double-door compact fridge praised for its energy-efficient, low-noise operation and flexible features like a reversible door and crisper drawer. Its main trade-offs are the need for clearance space, relatively heavy weight, and absence of premium amenities. Best suited for bedrooms, dorms or offices where quiet, efficient cooling is a priority.
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
3.2 cu ftbest | 3.2 cu ftbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 25 dBbest | 38 dB |
1 yearsbest | 1 yearsbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 86.36 cm | 81.99 cmbest |
| ↓ lower better | 50.8 cm | 46.5 cmbest |
| ↓ lower better | 55.88 cm | 49.2 cmbest |
— | 3best | |
| ↓ lower better | 23.52 kg | 20.36 kgbest |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
Noise & Operation(1) | ||
Noise Level (dB) | 25 dB | 38 dB |
Energy & Power(1) | ||
Compressor Type | Compressor | High‑efficiency low‑energy |
Capacity & Dimensions(4) | ||
Height (cm) | 86.36 cm | 81.99 cm |
Width (cm) | 50.80 cm | 46.50 cm |
Depth (cm) | 55.88 cm | 49.20 cm |
Weight (kg) | 23.52 kg | 20.36 kg |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers emphasize the unit’s ENERGY STAR rating and low annual energy consumption of 323 kWh as standout efficiency points. They also commend the automatic defrost system and the flexibility of a reversible door combined with a separate freezer compartment, noting these features set it apart from many basic mini‑fridges. However, reviewers point out the limited capacity and absence of ice‑making or smart controls as trade‑offs.
There is little publicly available user feedback in the sources, so consumer sentiment cannot be fully assessed. The limited data suggests that users who prioritize space-saving and energy efficiency appreciate the model, while the lack of ice-maker and small capacity are common concerns.
