
Royal Gourmet CC1830FC
Score: 70/100
Realcook Charcoal BBQ Smoker Grill
Score: 74/100Rankings

The Realcook 20-inch vertical smoker offers a large 636 sq in cooking area and modular disassembly for transport, plus built-in thermometer and meat hangers. Weight variations and lack of a cover are notable drawbacks. It fits backyard enthusiasts seeking a versatile, portable smoker.

The Royal Gourmet CC1830F-C combines a 30-inch charcoal grill with an offset smoker, delivering strong heat retention and good value. Its lightweight build and limited cooking area can affect stability and capacity for larger gatherings. Perfect for beginners or casual grillers needing an affordable, portable setup.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
5.94 sqftbest | 4.42 sqft | |
| ↓ lower better | 45.2 lb | 35.2 lbbest |
| ↓ lower better | 46.5 in | 41.34 inbest |
| ↓ lower better | 44.49 in | 20.67 inbest |
| ↓ lower better | 27.44 in | 24.8 inbest |
2best | 2best | |
1 yearsbest | — |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Performance(1) | ||
Cooking Area (Total) (sqft) | 5.94 sqft | 4.42 sqft |
Build & Design(5) | ||
Weight (lb) | 45.2 lb | 35.2 lb |
Height (in) | 46.5 in | 41.34 in |
Width (in) | 44.49 in | 20.67 in |
Length (in) | 27.44 in | 24.8 in |
Grate Material | Porcelain-enameled steel | Porcelain-enameled |

Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

Professional editors at Tractor Supply and the manufacturer emphasize the CC1830F-C's strong heat retention, ease of use, and adjustable controls, positioning it as an excellent entry-level grill for families and beginners.
Everyday users rate the grill highly for its smoky flavor, even heating, and straightforward assembly, noting it offers good value for casual BBQs. Common criticisms focus on inconsistent cooking-area specifications, the need for a stable surface due to its light weight, and occasional difficulty fine-tuning airflow.



No professional reviews, editor ratings, or expert analyses were found in the available sources; all references are product listings without commentary.
Consumer feedback is absent from the sources; the product pages explicitly state that there are no user reviews.