Samsung QB75N-W
Score: 73/100
Samsung WA65D
Score: 75/100Rankings

The Samsung WA65D 65" interactive display combines 4K resolution, 40-point IR touch, and Android 13 with Google integration, offering solid performance for education and business, though it lacks a built-in mic and is relatively heavy.
The Samsung QB75N-W is a 75-inch commercial-grade 4K LED interactive display with IR touch, integrated media player and MagicInfo software. It offers high contrast and robust connectivity, but its thick bezel, modest RAM and high power draw may limit appeal in some environments.
| Attribute | Samsung QB75N-W | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
75 inchesbest | 65 inches | |
350 nits | 400 nitsbest | |
6,000best | 1,200 | |
120 Hzbest | 60 Hz | |
| ↓ lower better | 8 msbest | 8 msbest |
4 | 40best | |
72 %best | 72 %best | |
3 | 4best |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | Samsung QB75N-W | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Touch(1) | ||
Touch Points | 4 | 40 |
Display(5) | ||
Screen Size (inches) | 75 inches | 65 inches |
Brightness (nits) | 350 nits | 400 nits |
Contrast Ratio | 6000 | 1200 |
Refresh Rate (Hz) | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
Panel Type | LED | Direct LED |
Connectivity(2) | ||
HDMI Ports | 3 | 4 |
USB Ports | 3 | 6 |
Power & Energy(1) | ||
Power Consumption (W) | 158 W | 184 W |
Build & Design(1) | ||
Weight (kg) | 38 kg | 33.9 kg |

Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers praise the QB75N-W for its crisp 4K display, reliable 16/7 operation and the convenience of an integrated media player and interactive software.
Everyday users appreciate the clear 4K visuals, intuitive touch interface and the all-in-one design that simplifies installation. Common praise focuses on the ease of setup and built-in speakers, while recurring complaints involve bezel size, occasional touch calibration drift and wishes for higher brightness in bright environments.

Professional reviewers praise the touch responsiveness, Google Workspace integration, and connectivity, while noting the lack of a microphone and front-port accessibility.
Everyday users commend the responsive touch, easy setup, and bright display, but mention the missing microphone and weight.
“Incredibly responsive touch”

“Easy setup and Google integration”

“Bright, clear display”


Higher refresh rate but fewer touch points