Samsung Type-C 128GB
Score: 81/100
Marryler 230GB Waterproof
Score: 70/100Rankings
The Samsung 128 GB Type-C flash drive combines fast read performance with a dual-connector design and rugged durability, making it a versatile choice for creators, though its plastic build and lack of encryption may deter premium-seeking users.
The Marryler 230 GB USB flash drive offers a rugged metal body, high capacity and broad device compatibility, but it lacks verified high-speed performance and has a short warranty.
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
128 GB | 230 GBbest | |
400 MB/sbest | — | |
300 MB/sbest | — | |
60 monthsbest | 6 months | |
| ↓ lower better | 3.4 gbest | 10 g |
| ↓ lower better | 33.8 mmbest | 45 mm |
| ↓ lower better | 16 mm | 12 mmbest |
| ↓ lower better | 8.1 mm | 5 mmbest |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | |
|---|---|---|
Storage(1) | ||
Capacity (GB) | 128 GB | 230 GB |
Warranty(1) | ||
Warranty Period (months) | 60 months | 6 months |
Physical(5) | ||
Weight (g) | 3.4 g | 10 g |
Length (mm) | 33.8 mm | 45 mm |
Width (mm) | 16.0 mm | 12 mm |
Height (mm) | 8.1 mm | 5 mm |
Material | Plastic | Aluminum alloy |
Connectivity(1) | ||
USB Interface | USB 3.2 Gen 1 | USB 2.0 |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers highlight the drive's exceptional read performance and rugged, multi-proof construction, while pointing out the slower write speeds and occasional OTG compatibility quirks.
Everyday users rate the drive highly for speed, durability, and convenience of dual connectors, with complaints focused on write speed and the plastic feel.
Professional reviewers consider Marryler a legitimate budget brand that delivers solid durability and adequate storage, but they criticize its lack of high-speed performance, limited warranty, and weaker tech support compared to established competitors.
Everyday users value the drive's rugged metal construction, waterproof rating, and keychain design, while repeatedly noting slower transfer speeds, occasional early failures, and confusion over actual usable capacity.
