
Tuft & Needle Mint Cal King
Score: 83/100
Nectar Ultra Hybrid
Score: 76/100Rankings

The Tuft & Needle Mint Hybrid is a Cal King mattress that combines Adaptive foam with individually pocketed springs, delivering strong cooling and responsive support. Its medium plush feel may be too firm for side sleepers and the heavy boxed weight can be cumbersome. Best suited for back and stomach sleepers seeking lumbar support.

The Nectar Ultra Hybrid 15" Queen is a high-profile hybrid mattress praised for its contouring memory foam and robust cooling system. Its heavy weight and lack of a warranty are notable trade-offs. Best suited for back, side and combination sleepers who value pressure relief and edge support.
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
35.56 cm | 38.1 cmbest | |
182.88 cmbest | 152.4 cm | |
212.09 cmbest | 203.2 cm | |
10 yearsbest | — | |
100 days | 365 daysbest | |
| ↓ lower better | 63.05 kg | 50.8 kgbest |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
Dimensions(3) | ||
Height (cm) | 35.56 cm | 38.1 cm |
Width (cm) | 182.88 cm | 152.4 cm |
Length (cm) | 212.09 cm | 203.2 cm |
Warranty(1) | ||
Trial Period (days) | 100 days | 365 days |
Construction(2) | ||
Coil Type | Individually Pocketed Springs | Individually Wrapped Coils |
Foam Type | Adaptive Foam, Flex Foam | Memory Foam |
Comfort(2) | ||
Firmness | Medium Plush | Medium Firm |
Cooling Technology | Ceramic, Cooling Gel, Graphite, Diamond-Infused Memory Foam | Cooling Fibers + Phase Change Material |
Physical(1) | ||
Weight (kg) | 63.05 kg | 50.8 kg |


Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).

Professional reviewers rate the Original Hybrid highly for its cooling ability, responsive support, and lumbar relief, giving it an overall 8.75/10.
Everyday users praise the medium feel, cooling performance, and straightforward setup, especially back and stomach sleepers. Common complaints focus on insufficient plushness for side sleepers, noticeable motion for light couples, and the heaviness of the boxed product.

Professional reviewers and editors are not cited in the available sources; the product description relies on marketing claims that highlight superior edge support, motion isolation, and airflow as upgrades over the Nectar Classic Hybrid.
Everyday user feedback is absent from the research data, so consumer sentiment cannot be directly assessed beyond inferred appreciation for cooling and support and concerns about weight and height.
