Rankings
The LG 27G640A-B is a 27-inch QHD IPS gaming monitor with a blistering 300 Hz refresh rate and 1 ms response, delivering ultra-smooth visuals. Its main trade-off is the lack of disclosed brightness/contrast data and no integrated speakers. Ideal for esports enthusiasts with a powerful GPU who value speed and color accuracy.
The ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACDNG is a 26.5-inch QD-OLED monitor offering an extreme 360 Hz refresh rate, 0.03 ms response and 99% DCI-P3 color coverage with HDR support. Its premium performance comes with high power draw, potential OLED burn-in risk, and a hefty build without speakers. Targeted at esports pros and HDR enthusiasts demanding top-tier visual fidelity.
The Lenovo Legion 27QD-10 is a 27-inch QHD IPS monitor excelling with a 240 Hz refresh rate and sub-millisecond response. Its main trade-offs are limited brightness and lack of VESA-mount details. Ideal for competitive gamers who prioritize speed and color accuracy.
The Samsung Odyssey G50D is a 32-inch flat IPS gaming monitor delivering QHD resolution with a rapid 180 Hz refresh rate and 1 ms response time. Its modest 1000:1 contrast and DisplayHDR 400 limit HDR performance and deep blacks. Ideal for budget-conscious competitive gamers and creators needing accurate colors.
The HP OMEN 32c is a 31.5-inch curved VA gaming monitor delivering QHD resolution, 165 Hz refresh and strong color accuracy. Its HDMI 1.4 limitation, modest built-in speakers and sizable footprint are notable trade-offs. Best suited for enthusiasts who prioritize immersive visuals and ergonomic adjustability.
The Alienware AW2725DM is a 27-inch QHD IPS monitor delivering 180 Hz refresh, 1 ms response and dual VRR compatibility, offering smooth high-speed gaming with vivid colors. Its limited contrast and HDR performance, plus HDMI bandwidth constraints, keep it from being a top-tier visual experience. Best for gamers who want high refresh rates and flexible VRR support without needing premium HDR depth.
The MSI G273CQ is a 27-inch curved VA gaming monitor offering a fast 170 Hz refresh rate and 1 ms response time, delivering smooth gameplay and deep contrast. It lacks built-in speakers and has only basic HDR support, which may limit visual punch. Ideal for budget-focused competitive gamers who value high refresh and eye-care features.
The Gigabyte GS27QA SA is a 27-inch QHD IPS monitor offering a blistering 180 Hz refresh rate and 1 ms response, making it ideal for fast-paced gaming. Its ergonomics are limited to tilt only and HDR brightness falls short of premium expectations. Best suited for budget-conscious competitive gamers who prioritize speed and color accuracy over extensive adjustability.
The Samsung Odyssey G55C is a 32-inch curved VA monitor with QHD resolution, 165 Hz refresh, and 1 ms MPRT response, providing smooth gameplay and deep contrast. Its tilt-only stand and modest brightness constrain ergonomics and HDR impact. Suited for budget gamers wanting an immersive curved display.
| Attribute | | | | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.5 inches | 27 inches | 31.5 inches | 32 inchesbest | 27 inches | 27 inches | 27 inches | 32 inchesbest | 27 inches | |
360 Hzbest | 240 Hz | 165 Hz | 180 Hz | 170 Hz | 180 Hz | 300 Hz | 165 Hz | 180 Hz | |
| ↓ lower better | 0.03 msbest | 0.5 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms |
250 nits | 300 nits | 400 nitsbest | 350 nits | 300 nits | 400 nitsbest | — | 300 nits | 300 nits | |
99 % | 99 % | 90 % | 99 % | 115 %best | 95 % | 95 % | — | 100 % | |
1,500,000best | 1,000 | 3,000 | 1,000 | 3,000 | 1,000 | — | 2,500 | 1,000 | |
| ↓ lower better | 7.44 kg | 5.59 kg | 10.379 kg | 7.39 kg | 4.55 kgbest | 6.57 kg | 5.5 kg | 5.2 kg | 5.26 kg |
1best | 1best | 1best | 1best | 1best | 1best | 1best | 1best | 1best |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | | | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Connectivity(1) | |||||||||
HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Display(8) | |||||||||
Panel Type | QD-OLED | IPS | VA | Fast IPS | VA | IPS | IPS | VA | SS IPS |
Screen Size (inches) | 26.5 inches | 27 inches | 31.5 inches | 32 inches | 27 inches | 27 inches | 27 inches | 32 inches | 27 inches |
Resolution | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 | 2560 x 1440 | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 | 2560x1440 |
Refresh Rate (Hz) | 360 Hz | 240 Hz | 165 Hz | 180 Hz | 170 Hz | 180 Hz | 300 Hz | 165 Hz | 180 Hz |
Response Time (ms) | 0.03 ms | 0.5 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms | 1 ms |
Brightness (nits) | 250 nits | 300 nits | 400 nits | 350 nits | 300 nits | 400 nits | — | 300 nits | 300 nits |
Color Gamut Coverage (%) | 99 % | 99 % | 90 % | 99 % | 115 % | 95 % | 95 % | — | 100 % |
Static Contrast Ratio | 1500000 | 1000 | 3000 | 1000 | 3000 | 1000 | — | 2500 | 1000 |
General(1) | |||||||||
Warranty (years) | 3 years | 3 years | 1 years | 1 years | 2 years | 3 years | 1 years | 1 years | 3 years |
Build & Design(5) | |||||||||
Weight (with stand) (kg) | 7.44 kg | 5.59 kg | 10.379 kg | 7.39 kg | 4.55 kg | 6.57 kg | 5.5 kg | 5.2 kg | 5.26 kg |
Width (with stand) (mm) | 610.3 mm | 613.7 mm | 520.95 mm | 713.74 mm | 609.6 mm | 613 mm | 614.68 mm | 710.1 mm | 619 mm |
Height (with stand) (mm) | 509.4 mm | 529.1 mm | 218.95 mm | 581.66 mm | 482.6 mm | 519.5 mm | 538.48 mm | 533.6 mm | 447 mm |
Tilt Range (degrees) | 25 degrees | — | — | — | — | 16 degrees | — | 20 degrees | 25 degrees |
Swivel Range (degrees) | 90 degrees | — | — | — | — | 40 degrees | — | — | — |
Audio(1) | |||||||||
Built‑in Speakers | — | — | true | — | false | false | false | — | — |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers commend the monitor's premium QD-OLED panel, ultra-high 360 Hz refresh rate, and robust anti-flicker and burn-in technologies, positioning it as a top-tier choice for esports and HDR work, though they note the scarcity of in-depth independent testing and lingering OLED burn-in worries.
No specific user reviews or testimonials were found in the research, indicating limited publicly shared consumer feedback.
“no more blur or stuttering”
Choose the MSI G273CQ for slightly higher refresh and extra eye-care; pick the Odyssey G5 if brand preference or specific Samsung features matter.
Professional reviewers commend the Legion 27QD-10 for its ultra-high refresh rate, rapid response time, and excellent color coverage, calling it a powerhouse for esports and console gaming. However, they note the modest 300-nit brightness and missing mounting details as drawbacks for HDR-focused or highly customized setups.
Professional reviewers commend the HP OMEN 32c for its immersive 1500R curve, buttery-smooth 165 Hz performance, and excellent color accuracy with 99 % sRGB and 90 % DCI-P3 coverage. They also highlight the ergonomic stand and HDR capability as strong points, while noting the large footprint, HDMI 1.4 limitation, and modest built-in speakers as drawbacks.
Everyday users rave about the monitor's immersive curvature and the elimination of blur or stuttering during fast games, praising the vivid colors and adjustable stand for comfort. Recurring complaints focus on the bulkiness, weak speakers, limited HDMI bandwidth, and occasional ghosting in dark scenes.
Professional reviewers consider the Odyssey G50D a solid entry-level QHD gaming monitor, lauding its 180 Hz refresh rate, fast IPS panel and comprehensive VRR support, while consistently pointing out its low contrast and modest HDR capabilities as the main drawbacks.
Everyday users generally enjoy the monitor's smooth performance, vibrant colors and ergonomic stand, but repeatedly mention disappointment with the low contrast, lackluster HDR and limited connectivity, especially in darker viewing environments.
Professional reviews are not available for the G273CQ; official MSI and retailer descriptions highlight its 170 Hz/1 ms performance, 1500R curve and eye-care features as strengths for competitive gaming, while noting the lack of built-in speakers and limited HDR certification.
Everyday users have not posted detailed reviews, but common questions focus on the high refresh rate, fast response time and VESA mounting options, with no recurring complaints evident in the available data.
Professional reviewers consider the AW2725DM an entry-level 1440p gaming monitor that excels in refresh rate, low input lag, and VRR versatility, but they note its low contrast, subpar HDR implementation, and HDMI bandwidth limitations as notable drawbacks.
Everyday users overwhelmingly appreciate the monitor's high refresh rate, vibrant colors, and ergonomic stand, while recurring criticisms focus on weak contrast, underwhelming HDR, stand wobble, and calibration issues.
Professional reviewers and editors have not published detailed tests for the LG 27G640A yet; product listings highlight its 300 Hz speed, HDR400 support, and dual adaptive-sync technologies, but performance claims remain unverified.
Professional reviewers praise the G55C for its immersive 1000R curve, strong VA contrast and ultra-smooth 165 Hz performance with broad VRR support, positioning it as a compelling budget option. However, they consistently point out ergonomic shortcomings such as the tilt-only stand and the inconvenience of an external power brick, as well as modest brightness that limits HDR impact.
Everyday users echo the professional sentiment, highlighting the monitor's immersive feel and fluid gameplay as major positives while frequently mentioning the limited stand adjustability and inconvenient port layout as pain points. Overall sentiment is positive regarding value and performance, with occasional complaints about brightness in well-lit rooms.
Professional reviewers commend the GS27QA for its high 180 Hz refresh rate, 1 ms response, and full sRGB coverage, calling it a strong value proposition for competitive gamers. They also note the clean design, useful OSD Sidekick software, and solid eye-care certifications, while criticizing the limited ergonomic adjustments and modest HDR performance.
Everyday buyers praise the monitor's fluid 180 Hz gameplay, vibrant colors, and affordable price, especially appreciating the eye-care features for long sessions. Common complaints revolve around the tilt-only stand, lack of built-in speakers, and HDR that falls short of expectations in bright environments.
