Rankings
The Garmin Instinct 3 50 mm Solar is a rugged outdoor smartwatch delivering unlimited solar-augmented battery life and advanced multi-band GPS accuracy. Its monochrome display and bulkier form factor may deter those preferring a sleek, colorful watch. It excels for extreme-adventure athletes needing durability and extensive fitness data.
The Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Pro is a premium fitness tracker featuring a bright 1.74-inch AMOLED display, built-in GPS and long battery life. Trade-offs include the lack of NFC and music control plus a slightly bulkier design. Ideal for outdoor athletes who value accurate navigation and a vivid screen.
The Amazfit Bip 6 delivers a 14-day battery, built-in GPS with free maps and a bright 1.97-inch AMOLED display, offering a feature-rich experience at a budget price. Limitations include the absence of NFC, occasional Bluetooth stability issues, and a less premium feel. It is best suited for budget-conscious fitness enthusiasts who want long battery life, GPS tracking and a large, readable screen.
The Xiaomi Smart Band 8 Pro delivers a bright AMOLED screen, built-in GPS and long battery life in a premium aluminum-alloy body. It is marginally heavier and depends on a companion app, which may deter users seeking a minimalist experience. Best for users who need accurate outdoor tracking without sacrificing display quality.
Amazfit Band 7 is a lightweight fitness band with a 1.47-inch AMOLED screen, up to 18 days of typical battery life, 120 sport modes, and Alexa voice assistant. It does not include built-in GPS and occasional app sync issues can occur. Perfect for casual fitness enthusiasts who prioritize long battery and smart features.
The ScanWatch 2 combines a classic stainless-steel case with a small grayscale OLED screen and delivers a 30-day battery alongside ECG, SpO₂, temperature and comprehensive health tracking. Its limitations are the modest display size and lack of music or extensive smartwatch apps. It targets health-focused users who value medical-grade sensors and long battery life.
The Xiaomi Smart Band 9 offers a bright 1.62-inch AMOLED screen, ultra-light design and long battery life for everyday fitness tracking. It sacrifices built-in GPS and a higher-resolution display, which may disappoint power users. Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize comfort and basic health metrics.
The Xiaomi Smart Band 9 Active is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 1.47-inch 60 Hz TFT display and up to 18 days of battery life. Its low-resolution screen and absence of GPS limit its premium appeal. It's perfect for casual users seeking lightweight, long-lasting tracking.
The Garmin Forerunner 55 is an entry-level GPS running watch offering a lightweight design, long 2-week battery life and a sunlight-visible MIP display, making it ideal for beginners. Its trade-offs include the absence of advanced sensors like SpO₂, limited data customization, and no music features. Best suited for recreational runners who prioritize endurance and simplicity over premium analytics.
The Casio G-Shock GBD-800UC Power Trainer is a rugged, shock-resistant watch offering step counting, multi-timers and a 3-year battery in a durable case with 200 m water resistance. It lacks heart-rate and GPS sensors and provides only basic fitness data. It fits users who need a tough, low-maintenance trainer watch for everyday workouts.
The Samsung Galaxy Fit 3 (Gray) is a budget-friendly fitness tracker with a vivid AMOLED display and industry-leading 14-day battery life. Its main trade-offs are the absence of built-in GPS and on-device music storage. Best suited for casual users who prioritize long endurance and a lightweight design over advanced navigation features.
The Amzhero D26 is an entry-level rectangular smartwatch offering a bright 1.47-inch touchscreen, 24/7 heart-rate, SpO₂ and blood-pressure monitoring with a 15-day battery life. Its trade-offs include reliance on a smartphone for GPS and occasional sync hiccups. Best suited for budget-conscious beginners seeking basic health tracking.
| Attribute | | | Casio G-Shock Power Trainer | | | | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
504 hours | 336 hours | 26,280 hoursbest | 960 hours | 432 hours | 336 hours | 504 hours | 432 hours | 720 hours | 336 hours | 360 hours | 504 hours | |
| ↓ lower better | 15.8 g | 36.8 g | 4.5 gbest | 58 g | 16.5 g | 37 g | 40 g | 28 g | 83 g | 40.8 g | 82 g | 22.5 g |
1.62 inches | 1.6 inches | — | 1.1 inches | 1.47 inches | 1.04 inches | 1.74 inches | 1.47 inches | 0.63 inches | 1.97 inchesbest | 1.47 inches | 1.74 inches | |
| ↓ lower better | 1 hoursbest | 1 hoursbest | — | — | 2 hours | — | 1.25 hours | 2 hours | — | — | 2 hours | 1.25 hours |
94,080 pixels | — | — | 176 pixels | 55,040 pixels | — | 161,280 pixelsbest | — | 14,504 pixels | — | — | 161,280 pixelsbest | |
— | — | — | 1 years | 1 years | 1 years | 1 years | 1 years | 2 yearsbest | 1 years | 1 years | — | |
150 modesbest | 101 modes | — | — | 50 modes | — | 150 modesbest | 120 modes | — | 140 modes | 14 modes | 150 modesbest |
Click an attribute name to sort · Green = best, red = worst (relative to this comparison)
| Attribute | | | Casio G-Shock Power Trainer | | | | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery & Power(3) | ||||||||||||
Battery Life (hours) | 504 hours | 336 hours | 26280 hours | 960 hours | 432 hours | 336 hours | 504 hours | 432 hours | 720 hours | 336 hours | 360 hours | 504 hours |
Charging Time (hours) | 1 hours | 1 hours | — | — | 2 hours | — | 1.25 hours | 2 hours | — | — | 2 hours | 1.25 hours |
Warranty (years) | — | — | — | 1 years | 1 years | 1 years | 1 years | 1 years | 2 years | 1 years | 1 years | — |
Display(3) | ||||||||||||
Display Size (inches) | 1.62 inches | 1.6 inches | — | 1.1 inches | 1.47 inches | 1.04 inches | 1.74 inches | 1.47 inches | 0.63 inches | 1.97 inches | 1.47 inches | 1.74 inches |
Display Resolution (pixels) | 94080 pixels | 256x402 pixels | — | 176 pixels | 172x320 pixels | 208x208 pixels | 161280 pixels | 194x368 pixels | 14504 pixels | 390x450 pixels | — | 161280 pixels |
Display Type | AMOLED | AMOLED | Multi-mission LCD | — | TFT | MIP | AMOLED | AMOLED | Grayscale OLED | AMOLED | HD bright color touchscreen | AMOLED |
Features(1) | ||||||||||||
Sports Modes (modes) | 150 modes | 101 modes | — | — | 50 modes | — | 150 modes | 120 modes | — | 140 modes | 14 modes | 150 modes |
Build & Design(4) | ||||||||||||
Weight (g) | 15.8 g | 36.8 g | 4.5 g | 58 g | 16.5 g | 37 g | 40 g | 28 g | 83 g | 40.8 g | 82 g | 22.5 g |
Water Resistance (IP Rating) | 5ATM | IP68 | 200 m | — | 5ATM | 5 ATM | 5ATM | 5ATM | 5 ATM | 5 ATM | 5 ATM | 5ATM |
Case Material | Aluminum alloy | Aluminum | — | Fiber-reinforced polymer | — | — | Aluminum alloy, high-strength fiber polymer | — | Stainless steel | Aluminum alloy, fiber-reinforced polymer | — | Aluminum alloy, high‑strength fiber polymer |
Strap Material | TPU | — | — | Silicone | TPU | silicone | TPU, Calfskin | — | — | Liquid silicone | — | TPU, calfskin |
Connectivity(2) | ||||||||||||
Bluetooth Version | 5.4 | 5.3 | Bluetooth | — | 5.3 | — | 5.4 | 5.2 | — | 5.3 | 5.0 | 5.4 |
GPS | — | false | false | true | false | true | true | false | — | true | false | true |
Products in the top-left offer the best value (high score, low price).
Professional reviewers commend the Band 9 for its value-driven upgrades, especially the 1200-nit AMOLED display with ambient-light sensing, the 16 % heart-rate accuracy improvement, and the impressive 21-day battery life enabled by Bluetooth 5.4 and efficient sensors. They also highlight the stronger linear motor vibration and the lightweight aluminum frame, while noting the lack of built-in GPS and the smaller, lower-resolution screen as trade-offs against the higher-priced Pro variant.
Everyday users consistently praise the long battery life, feather-light comfort, bright outdoor-readable display, and reliable health tracking via the Mi Fitness app. Common themes include appreciation for the wide range of sport modes and water resistance, as well as the attractive color options. Recurring complaints focus on occasional app sync glitches, the absence of native GPS, and the modest screen resolution that feels low-end for notification detail.
“"imperceptible" for daily use”
“"most comfortable" at 16.5 g”
“Fitbit aesthetics for under $50”
Choose the Band 9 for cost-effective, lightweight fitness tracking; opt for the Pro if you need a larger screen and built-in GPS.
Select the Band 9 for a premium display and richer fitness features; the Active is suited for ultra-budget users who accept a simpler TFT screen.
Upgrade to the Band 9 for a brighter screen, longer battery, and better health tracking; stay with the Band 8 if the incremental improvements are not essential.
Choose the 9 Pro for superior brightness, battery life, and GNSS accuracy; choose the 8 Pro if you prefer a slimmer, lighter, and more affordable device.
Professional reviewers praise the Galaxy Fit 3 for its sizable AMOLED display, feather-light aluminum build, impressive 13-day battery life, and attractive price point, positioning it as a strong value proposition in the budget fitness-tracker segment. However, they consistently note the lack of built-in GPS and music storage as notable drawbacks, and the visible bezel is seen as a minor aesthetic compromise.
Professional commentary, though limited to official Casio and retailer descriptions, positions the GBD‑800UC as a budget‑friendly, rugged trainer watch that excels in step‑based fitness tracking and offers useful app integration, while acknowledging its lack of advanced health sensors.
While no direct user reviews are available, the inferred consumer sentiment praises the watch’s lightweight feel, durability, and app‑driven data logs, with occasional concerns about the absence of heart‑rate or GPS functionality and the mid‑size case on smaller wrists.
Professional reviewers commend the Instinct 3 Solar for its class-leading battery endurance, rugged metal-reinforced construction, and highly accurate multi-band GPS. They also appreciate the improved solar panel efficiency and robust health-tracking suite, while noting the trade-off of a monochrome display and a bulkier form factor that may not suit users seeking a bright, sleek screen.
Everyday users love the watch's durability and the ability to go weeks without charging thanks to solar power. The reliable GPS and handy flashlight receive frequent praise, but many complain about the dim monochrome screen in shade, the watch's heft on smaller wrists, and occasional GPS or heart-rate hiccups in challenging environments.
Professional reviewers and editors commend the Smart Band 9 Active for its ultra-light construction, long battery life, and smooth 60 Hz interface, noting it offers solid value with 50 sport modes and water resistance. However, they criticize its low-resolution TFT screen, limited brightness, and lack of auto-brightness, positioning it as a basic alternative to the higher-end Smart Band 9 and 9 Pro models.
Everyday users consistently praise the band's comfort, 18-day battery endurance, and lightweight feel for sleep and daily wear, while recurring complaints focus on the dim, manually-adjusted display and occasional tracking inaccuracies, especially in distance measurement.
Professional reviewers consider the Forerunner 55 a well-rounded, budget-friendly entry-level running watch. They commend its long battery life, clear display, and reliable wrist-based heart-rate monitoring, while noting the lack of advanced sensors and limited data customization as trade-offs for its price point.
Professional reviewers consider the Forerunner 55 a well-rounded, budget-friendly entry-level running watch. They commend its long battery life, clear display, and reliable wrist-based heart-rate monitoring, while noting the lack of advanced sensors and limited data customization as trade-offs for its price point.
Professional reviewers consider the Smart Band 9 Pro a significant step forward, emphasizing its expansive high-brightness display, robust GNSS capabilities, and comprehensive sport and health features. While the device is praised for comfort and visual clarity, the only notable drawback mentioned is the occasional lag in automatic brightness adaptation under sudden lighting changes.
Professional reviewers view the Amazfit Band 7 as a strong budget option, lauding its long battery life, bright AMOLED display and generous feature set including Alexa and 120 sport modes. They note the trade-offs of missing GPS, limited advanced health sensors and occasional app sync issues, positioning it as a value-focused alternative to pricier smart bands.
Everyday users praise the Band 7 for its impressive battery endurance, vibrant screen and comfortable all-day wear, especially appreciating its water resistance for swimming. Common complaints revolve around app stability, occasional heart-rate inaccuracies, the band's length on smaller wrists, and the lack of independent GPS for outdoor activities.
Professional reviewers praise the ScanWatch 2 for its impressive 30-day battery, premium materials and the seamless hybrid design that merges classic watch styling with modern health sensors. They also commend the precise accelerometer and the addition of temperature and HRV tracking. However, they note the 42 mm model's higher band-included weight and the modest 0.63-inch screen as drawbacks, and they flag inconsistencies in spec listings that could confuse buyers.
Everyday users generally enjoy the lightweight feel of the watch without the band, the long battery life and the subtle hybrid look that doesn't scream 'smartwatch.' The most common complaints revolve around the heft when the band is attached and the limited size of the OLED display, with some confusion about the exact glass material used.
Professional reviewers and editors consistently praise the Amazfit Bip 6 as a standout budget smartwatch, emphasizing its large, 2,000-nit AMOLED display, lightweight aluminum construction, accurate health sensors, and impressive 14-day battery life. They also note the inclusion of GPS with free maps and AI-driven workout coaching, while calling out occasional Bluetooth stability issues and a less premium feel compared to higher-end models.
Everyday users echo the professional praise, frequently highlighting the ultra-long battery, bright sunlight-readable screen, and comfortable lightweight design. Common complaints revolve around occasional Bluetooth drop-outs and limited strap adjustability, but overall sentiment is positive, with many saying the watch offers great value for its price.
A YouTube reviewer praised its lightweight comfort, clear screen, accurate heart-rate monitoring and pin-charging, calling it a "great little watch" with "nice quality packaging".
Everyday users commend the comfortable fit, easy setup and reliable basic tracking, while noting the need for the GloryFit app and occasional sync hiccups.
Professional reviewers commend the Band 9 Pro for its ultra-bright 1.74-inch AMOLED, comprehensive sensor suite, and the addition of full GNSS with a compass, calling the battery life 'super long' and the aluminum build premium. The main criticisms focus on the modest weight and thickness increase over the Band 8 Pro and the continued dependence on the Mi Fitness app for most features.
Everyday users echo the professional praise, highlighting the bright screen, reliable GPS, and week-long battery as the most appreciated aspects. Comfort and health tracking are also positively noted, while occasional complaints revolve around minor weight variations and the desire for more strap options.
Pick the Bip if you need standalone GPS; pick the D26 for a simpler charging method and a more comfortable fit
Choose the 9 Pro for brighter display, GPS accuracy and longer battery; choose the 8 Pro if you prefer a lighter, slimmer band.
